top of page

The Conspiracy of Bigfoot

Dovie Banta

Professor Beth Hammett

English 1113-32

Sprin 2026

(1)

Introduction

For decades, stories of a massive, ape-like creature that mysteriously roams the woods of North America have been persistent. This creature has tracks that measure “between 15 and 20 inches long” (Lorenzen 2). Bigfoot truly lives up to its name. Americans have commonly reported it as being tall, covered in hair, and walking on two legs (2).  One of the earliest documented accounts of this creature dates all the way back to 1840 (3). Scientists often dismiss the possibility of this creature as being anything more than a myth, but eyewitness reports, unexplained footage, and footprint casts remain consistent (2). Is Bigfoot just a highly developed legend or is this monstrous creature real? Despite the lack of clear video evidence, Bigfoot’s existence can be argued through physical evidence and witness reports.

ai-generated-8866750_960_720.png
2016ShawneeBigfoot.jpg

(2)

Character Analysis

Bigfoot is a legend that many people have heard about, but what do we know about the character of this creature? Stories of Bigfoot have circled around for decades, but only certain information and evidence has been reported. Many authors and storytellers have talked about the tendencies and characteristics of this beast (McLeod). Bigfoot is famously known for its massive stature and huge footprint, but there is another characteristic that popularly defines this mysterious creature: elusivity. 

Bigfoot has consistently remained a creature that seemingly hides its presence from man. One author, Loren Coleman, wrote, “They are retiring, alert, and clever, generally avoiding humans” (Coleman 7). Resultingly, and perhaps predictably, its elusive nature only fuels enthusiast’s drive to spot it. Coleman states that, “Sightings are scarcer than generally acknowledged, and close encounters in which good details are reported are extremely rare” (7). Reports of Bigfoot fleeing from the presence of humans remain persistent (Coleman). In fact, another noted Bigfoot author similarly states that “The creatures are quick and elusive, fleeing when they encounter humans” (Furek 9). Fortunately, perhaps, its behavior can also be described as “very curious but non-confrontational” (10). If this monstrous ape is real, it remains stealthily hidden away from the eyes of man. A field biologist by the name of Jim Hewkin stated in a book titled Anatomy of a Beast, written by Micheal McLeod,  “The thing about wild animals—they’re solitary. And Bigfoot is the most solitary of all” (McLeod 10). Bigfoot certainly appears to keep itself hidden much more skillfully and successfully than the average large animal. Another author wrote, “Sasquatches usually seem to take hiding from us to extreme levels. We knew that they were cautious when observing us … we realized just how stealthy they are” (Kuykendall 4). Altogether, the evidence (or lack thereof), fleeting observations, and professional writings consistently describing the cryptic nature of this creature certainly support the idea that Bigfoot remains a notoriously elusive legend. 

Next up is the famous characteristic that gives Bigfoot its namesake: an abnormally huge footprint. Bigfoot is most stereotypically known for its massive footprints that have been discovered and plastered on numerous occasions and in multiple locations. Coleman states that, “Evidence of these animals, as their name implies, is often in the form of large tracks found in the mud, sand, and snow” (Coleman 6). This is one trait that truly makes Bigfoot unique and sets it apart from all other primates, including humans. Coleman also states, “The Bigfoot foot has an hourglass outline and measures 4 to 9 inches in width by 11¾ to 20 inches in length” (6). Differences between a Bigfoot print and a human print are quite prominent, “Unlike in a human foot, halfway down the Bigfoot foot is a “split-ball” or double ball arrangement that is unique for these primates” (6). The average male human footprint is “(25.7 cm) compared to females (24.4 cm)” (Priya 4), meaning the largest human foot is still slightly smaller than the smallest average Bigfoot track. Author Maxim Furek states that “They leave footprints twice the size of humans” (Furek 10). Notably, this stark difference in foot size makes this particular characteristic of Bigfoot truly stand out. Opposingly, a trait of the foot that these sasquatch share with humans is that they are bipedal, or walk on two feet. Additionally, they also share a “metatarsal hinge in the foot” (Kuykendall 3). This allows them to walk just like humans and leave a footprint that looks strikingly similar. The amount of evidence and research concerning the size of Bigfoot’s footprint undoubtedly supports the claim that this creature has a very huge, unique, and defined footprint.

The conclusion derived from all of the available evidence and writings regarding these two specific traits is that Bigfoot is a creature that remains shrouded in mystery and leaves behind a footprint that could only be made by a massive and scientifically undocumented beast. These two traits could certainly be viewed as contrasting, because one involves a lack of physical evidence of its existence, while the other provides an abounding source of physical evidence. Nevertheless, perhaps these traits actually work in unison, demonstrating how the survival skills and the physical characteristics of Bigfoot enhance its overall ability to travel and survive in the wilderness largely undetected.

blue-yeti-8859519_1280.png
andreasstumpfdesigns-bigfoot-8714272_1920.jpg

(3)

Conspiracy Theories

There are two major conspiracy theories surrounding Bigfoot. The first conspiracy is that Bigfoot is allegedly the descendant of an ancient, massive ape called Gigantopithecus blacki. The second, and perhaps more interesting, conspiracy is that Bigfoot displays supernatural powers that humans and animals do not possess. 

The first conspiracy that has made its rounds and been embraced by many is that Bigfoot descended from a giant prehistoric species of ape originating in Asia. The Gigantopithecus blacki is believed to have lived in East Asia from around 2 million years ago to 350,000 years ago (Tita 9). Author Michele Tita states that, “Scholars could draw associations between Gigantopithecus and humanlike creatures in folklore, such as the Himalayan Yeti” (9). The Gigantopithecus and modern ape-like creatures do seemingly share many similarities genetically and physiologically. Author Grover Krantz states, “Anatomically, G. blacki is a higher primate of the hominoid superfamily of man and apes” (Krantz 1). Tita, discussing a viewpoint of Krantz’s, wrote, “Krantz suggested that communities of Gigantopithecus could have crossed the Bering Strait in the Pleistocene and settled in America. Accordingly, The American specimen of Gigantiopithecus would have evolved into the ape known as Bigfoot, or the Sasquatch” (Tita 9).  While these similarities and coincidences remain consistent, there is still a lack of proper evidence to confidently make this claim. Tita writes about how the Gigantiopithecus has not been proven to have actually arrived in America and additionally states that, “No fossil specimens of the ape have been found.” (10). Tita continues by stating, “The evolutionary origin of the Sasquatch from the Gigantiopithecus is far from being substantiated and accepted as a scientific fact; it should rather be regarded as a (vernacular) belief” (10). While there are many potential correlations and similarities between these two legends, this popular theory must remain merely a conspiracy due to a sufficient lack of evidence.

The second conspiracy theory that circles the legend of Bigfoot is the belief that it is a creature that possesses supernatural powers. Bigfoot has remained extremely hard to locate, track, or photograph, leading to a proposal of undocumented powers far beyond what man and animal are known by science to be capable of. Author Maxim W. Furek states, “A popular theme is the possible connection between Bigfoot and UFOs, or the “Interdimensional Theory” (Furek 15). He continues to state that, “Both entities appear to materialize and dematerialize rapidly and silently” (15). This supports the idea that Bigfoot is able to unnaturally appear and disappear from locations. Interestingly, it has also been theorized that the sasquatch is bulletproof and incapable of being harmed, supporting the conspiracy that it has some type of powers beyond current scientific understanding. Furek similarly states, “There have been numerous examples of Bigfoot being impervious to bullets. After being shot, they do not appear to have been harmed” (17). For many, the name Bigfoot simply encapsulates a paranormal legend. Author Marc E. Fitch states that, “Bigfoot has become probably more than any other paranormal phenomena, a part of the American mythology and culture” (Fitch 20). Writings and alleged evidence of Bigfoot being a supernatural wonder certainly remain consistent, but, again, hard evidence and verifiable proof simply doesn’t exist to prove this to be anything more than a conspiracy. 

The conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence and articles presented is that these two major conspiracy theories surrounding Bigfoot are just that: theories. It is not factually known if this extraordinarily elusive ape truly descended from the Gigantopithecus blacki, due to a glaring lack of scientific evidence supporting the mere existence of Bigfoot. It is also unknown if Bigfoot demonstrates powers that are beyond what man and animal are capable of. If this creature truly exists, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to gather solid evidence of its involvement in the paranormal and supernatural realm of existence. Nevertheless, these two conspiracy theories can certainly prove to be interesting to research and there remains a plethora of fascinating information that can be researched if one is so inclined to journey down that wormhole. 

.

forest-3082836_1280.jpg
ai-generated-9487297_1280.webp
foot-5999750_960_720.png

(4)

ai-generated-8602459_1280.jpg

Conclusion

Bigfoot is a conspiracy theory that must remain in the category of lore, as it is simply unable to truly be definitively proven or captured. Things like footprint plasters, blurry photographs, and alleged sightings certainly remain prevalent, and, while some people may consider these to be full-proof evidence of the creature's existence, there still remains a lack of valid scientific and physical proof to completely embrace the conspiracy of Bigfoot (Lorenzen 2).  Whether it be due to its confounding elusivity or to the simple fact that it doesn’t exist, Bigfoot has yet to have been bested by man. Therefore, until this skillful legend is truly captured, Bigfoot will likely remain one mystery that will never fully be solved. 

(5)

Works Cited

Coleman, Loren. Bigfoot!: The True Story of Apes in America. Simon and Schuster, 2009.

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=CsDBqy9oHHkC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=bigfoot+coleman&ots=x9Sv4iJzbC&sig=qm3n89ezcIVYFQFFEQ1m3R4tqts

​

Fitch, Marc E. Paranormal nation: Why America needs ghosts, UFOs, and bigfoot. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2013.

https://books.google.com/books hl=en&lr=&id=2IXDEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=bigfoot+supernatural&ots=qO7r1QxsdX&sig=_F9pnKpEaIUOL61IX6XzambML_U#v=onepage&q=bigfoot%20supernatural&f=false

​

Furek, Maxim W. The Lost Tribes of Bigfoot. Untold Publishing, 2024.

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=kw4cEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT6&dq=bigfoot+furek&ots=MtkQyrWIda&sig=dbmZnHQ7i1xsMOBaeVsBYznOY4o

​

Krantz, Grover. "Bigfoot Evidence: Are These Tracks Real?. https://cryptozoologicalreferencelibrary.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/krantz-1986.pdf 

​

Kuykendall, John. Bigfoot 50 Years Later. Lulu. com, 2018.

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=eLvPDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=bigfoot+kuykendall&ots=z4_2AzjB2c&sig=nGA6ceceyAFz_GtJDCT0G2aI-jM

​

Lorenzen, Michael. “Bigfoot in American Folklore: Regional Variations and Cultural Significance” Literature Review. www.academia.edu, https://www.academia.edu/143645742/Bigfoot_in_American_Folklore_Regional_Variations_and_Cultural_Significance_Literature_Review. Accessed 9 Feb. 2026.

​

McLeod, Michael. Anatomy of a Beast: Obsession and Myth on the Trail of Bigfoot. Univ of California Press, 2009.

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_6FmjJYd13wC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=bigfoot+mcleod&ots=SkCzY0wAMz&sig=-fjuSm8zuEDpDW7aWk9yunL83yk

​

Priya, Mansi. "Footprint Length: A Reliable Indicator of Stature." International Journal of Life Sciences, Biotechnology and Pharma Research, 2025.

http://ijlbpr.com/uploadfiles/136vol14issue1pp792-796.20250301095831.pdf

​

Tita, Michele. "Beliefs and Science of the Sasquatch/Bigfoot: Examples of Vernacular (Re) search." Tautosakos darbai 70 (2025): 106-122.

https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/td/article/view/42075 

bottom of page